![]()
Dense breast tissue can mask more than half of invasive breast cancers on the mammogram – even the digital mammogram.i
![]() |
|
Do you see the 1.2cm cancer in this patient? |
Her radiologist did – with SonoCiné. |
Some have suggested that poor performance, and associated costs and adverse psychological effects of poor performance (of mammography), in women under 50 (primarily dense-breasted women) is reason to forego any type of screening.ii
Others have demonstrated that supplemental examinations can find most of the cancers missed by mammography in the dense-breasted patient.iii, iv, v
What solution can you offer your patient?
Dr. Tom Stavros, Radiologist, Sutter Santa Rosa, CA
SonoCiné is a clinically-tested,iv, v automated supplemental ultrasound method that
100% increase in cancer detection by including US
|
SonoCiné is a clinically-tested,iv, v automated supplemental ultrasound method that
|
iPisano ED, et al, Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening, NEJM, 353;17, October 27, 2005
ii U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , “Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement”, Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol 151, No. 10, 17 Nov 2009
iii Pisano Wendie A. Berg; Jeffrey D. Blume; Jean B. Cormack; et al., Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer, JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151-2163
iv Kevin M. Kelly,MD, Judy Dean, MD, W. Scott Comulada, Sung-Jae Lee, “Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts”, Eur Radiol (2010) 20: 734–742
v Kevin M. Kelly,MD, Judy Dean, MD, W. Scott Comulada, Sung-Jae Lee, “Breast cancer detection: radiologists’ performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound”, Eur Radiol (2010) 20: 2557–2564

